It is widely accepted that to avoid total environmental collapse, human-generated greenhouse gas emissions need to reach net-zero no later than 2050. Carbon accounting will play a crucial role in these decarbonization efforts across the corporate value chain. Over 90% of companies listed on the S&P 500 and 70% on the Russell 1000 published sustainability reports in 2020, and this number has been climbing annually. However, compliance alone is no longer the main driver for sustainable business strategies.
The triple bottom line of people, planet, and profit goes beyond regulatory mandates and creates an opportunity for corporations to lead instead of follow. Additionally, the range of benefits associated with high environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings continues to grow, from better risk management to improved long-term financial success. As a result, voluntary ESG reporting is on the rise, and carbon accounting frameworks are a core mechanism to demonstrate impact reduction.
In the race towards globally mandated net-zero goals, the right carbon accounting system will be vital in making informed decisions for effective corporate sustainability strategies. However, the carbon accounting process remains relatively opaque, with no single internationally accepted methodology.
To help you navigate this process, we've broken down the leading carbon accounting protocols and their key differences.
Why Pursue Carbon Accounting
Understanding how many emissions a business produces and where they come from is the first step in any decarbonization strategy. Additionally, the most widely accepted ESG reporting frameworks require an accurate count of your emissions.
Today, innovative carbon accounting systems are no longer a one size fits all calculation. Instead, they are built to be sector-specific and use different methodologies depending on scope. There are many reasons to pursue a carbon accounting protocol within an ESG framework, such as:
Since then, the GHG protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard has become the world's most widely used greenhouse gas accounting standard. It provides various resources, including calculation tools, guidance, and verification services.
The hallmark of the GHG Protocol is a three-scope method of tracking emissions, with the sum being the total carbon footprint.
Scope 1: Direct emissions, including those created from production and transportation equipment.
Scope 2: Indirect emissions from energy purchased or generated.
Scope 3: All other indirect emissions (value chain emissions), usually from the supply chain, including a company's customers and end-use consumers.
The same three scopes that define the GHG Protocol are also considered one of its weaknesses. While most companies using this protocol include Scopes 1 and 2, some do not include Scope 3.
This is likely because Scope 3 requires information from suppliers and customers throughout the value chain, which is challenging to calculate. However, for many companies, Scope 3 emissions will represent the most significant part of a company's carbon footprint.
Who Uses the GHG Protocol:Companies, cities, and governments use this carbon accounting protocol. Over 90% of Fortune 500 companies use the GHG Protocol directly or indirectly.
The Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
The TCFD was created by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) to improve market transparency by recommending what carbon emissions financial companies should measure and how to report them. Founded in 2017, the TCFD is structured around four themes: governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets.
Unlike the GHG Protocol, which solely focuses on carbon accounting, the TCFD includes 11 disclosures to provide transparency to carbon reporting.
The goal of TCFD is to harmonize greenhouse gas accounting methods within the financial industry to allow financial organizations to consistently measure their emissions and support investors in weighing risks related to climate change.
However, there are some complaints regarding this framework. One of the most prevalent is company directors citing increased liability arising from the uncertainty associated with forecasted carbon emissions -- one of the key criteria of the TCFD.
Who Uses the TCFD Protocol: Financial markets (investors, lenders, and insurance underwriters) use the TCFD Protocol as part of ESG reporting and carbon accounting. The main regions that use TCFD include the European Union, Singapore, Canada, Japan, Hong Kong, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.
The Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF)
Created by Dutch banks in 2015, PCAF measures financed emissions, helping to align financial institutions with net zero goals. Building on the GHG accounting methodologies developed by GHG Protocol, they aim to create a consistent global GHG accounting standard for financial institutions covering various assets.
These asset classes include:
Listed Equity and Corporate Bonds
Business Loans and Unlisted Equity
Commercial Real Estate
Motor Vehicle Loans
The PCAF is complementary to the TCFD and provides a framework for financial institutions to disclose their greenhouse gas emissions. It does not provide its own carbon accounting tools and conforms with the GHG Protocol.
Who Uses PCAF: The PCAF Standard is being implemented in five regions: Africa, Asia-Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and North America. It covers financial institutions and financial products of all sizes.
Corporate Sustainability Means Leaning into Carbon Accounting
Understanding the available carbon accounting and emissions reporting frameworks is critical in measuring your emissions and developing a sustainability plan. While it is still voluntary to report on business sustainability, investors, stakeholders, and governments are beginning to expect it. We would not be surprised if sustainability reporting becomes a requirement in the not-so-distant future – the SEC has pending regulations calling for it.
A carbon accounting protocol and robust sustainability strategy help companies be proactive and prepare for regulatory change. Additionally, there is a large list of financial and social benefits for ESG-conscious businesses. If you want to capitalize on these benefits, let us know! We have the tools in place to help you develop a robust sustainability strategy and choose an effective carbon accounting framework for your business.